Sunday, February 21, 2010

Everything Pure (Part 1)

I like movies. There is nothing for it. Every week I spend time watching movies that I could be spending on other, more constructive things. I'm sure we all do. I have been thinking a lot lately about positive and negative aspects of this pass-time. I could beat around the bush and go on about how I come to thinking about these things, but I would rather get right to a simple question: What movies are okay, and what movies are sinful?

This is quite a large can of worms to be opening up all at once. If you are anything like me, you don't like opening it in the first place, because it could lead you to the conclusion that your favorite movie of all time is actually sinful to watch. I can't help it. I think about everything.

What kind of movies do you like? I don't know about you, but I like the scary ones. There is almost unfailingly bad language and gory deaths in the movies I like. I make great efforts to avoid the ones with sexual content in them. For me, if I walk out of that theatre looking over my shoulder to make sure no rabid monsters are chasing me, I have thoroughly enjoyed the movie. I have no problem with the scary part. If I, or anyone for that matter, feel like getting scared for fun, I see nothing wrong with it. It is the language and death that make me think. Is it really okay to watch seventeen people die bloody deaths through the course of a movie? Does God give no thought to the foul language used by the characters every two minutes?

Let's start with the language. Is it wrong to watch a movie with swearing? Most Christians would say yes, it is. I guess I could be counted in the "I have an opinion, but I'm liable to change it" list. What is in a word? A better worded question is what is the significance of a word. If I were to run up to you and shout "fire", what would cross your mind? More than likely you would picture a house burning down, and possibly become concerned, depending if I sounded serious or not. The significance of the word is what it means to you. It is significant because it conveys the message I am trying to get across to you. A word is a method of communicating a thought, idea, or an emotion to the listener. Beyond the implication, or meaning, the rest is simply grammatical context and a few letters.

What if I ran up to you, shouted "You're stupid, get away from me!" in your face, and walked away? What would cross your mind? You would probably be seriously offended, upset, and angry at me for being so rude. Why? Because I conveyed to you a message that was hurtful, cruel, and uncalled for. I offended you, and you would have a right to be mad. What about the word? Did the word "stupid" have anything to do with it? Some might say yes, but consider an alternative to my approach. What if, in the same scenario previously mentioned, I walked up to you and calmly said "You lack any form of intelligence, and can do nothing right. I do not like you, and want nothing to do with you. Good day." Would you feel any different than when I shouted the word "stupid"? Probably not. I conveyed the same message, simply through different means.

I am riding my bicycle at 20 mile per hour, and suddenly realized that I am about to run a poor, unsuspecting old lady over and have no time to react. I shout "Oh my goodness!" and plow into the lady. Setting aside the poor, injured senior citizen, would anyone call me a bad person for shouting "Oh my goodness"? Of course not! I was surprised! What if I had shouted "Oh shit!"? Then would people be offended? Of course they would, but why? I conveyed the same message, simply using different means. Instead of shouting about my goodness I shouted about poop. Sure, poop is disgusting, but is there anything inherently wrong with it? Not really; everyone does it. Some people are disgusted by throwing up, and "puke" is not a bad word. If I had used the word in reference to you, that would be a different story. I would once again be conveying a hurtful message, which is wrong.

I concur, then, that it is the meaning behind any given word that makes it inherently "bad" or "good". If you start condemning certain letter combinations it becomes a bit legalistic in my humble opinion. It is merely the spirit behind the word that is evil, because a word, in and of itself is inanimate. It can be neither good nor evil.

What then? Am I condoning a foul mouth? Certainly not! (I thought I'd go for a bit of a Pauline feel there.) Many people, in fact most people are offended by swearing. I am one of those people if it is done in extreme excess. However, as I said before, can the words themselves be bad? Not really.

"Let us therefore make every effort to do what leads to peace and to mutual edification. Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All food is clean, but it is wrong for a man to eat anything that causes someone else to stumble. It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall." --Rom. 14:19-21

Food was the example Paul chose to use. It was the controversy of the day. Foul language may be compared to it. There is inherently nothing wrong with the words, but the affect they have on other people, especially Christians, is negative, and it then becomes a sin. This, I would say, makes it wrong in almost any case for a Christian. Further, if your parents tell you not to swear and you do, it is a sin. Most of our parents would tell us not to.

There are, however, certain words that I believe are unfit for conversation. Any foul word that is affiliated with sexuality or sex organs is unfit for normal conversation. This is what I believe the Bible defines as course talk.

In movies, for the most part I see nothing wrong with language. The people on the screen are saying the words, not you. If you are offended by them, don't watch the movie. Problem solved. If you are prone to repeating what you hear, it is probably best to keep away from the exposure. One could argue that the character is using the words with the wrong spirit behind them, thus making them wrong. This is true, but if you think thus, I suggest avoiding any movie in which people talk when they are angry. It is the spirit, not the words. You will find a sinful spirit behind many "innocent" words in any movie you watch. It is exactly the same thing.

In conclusion, then, I would encourage you by saying that if you have ever said a "bad" word, as long as your spirit was right and you didn't offend anyone, I seriously doubt you sinned. How much less a sin is it then to simply hear the words? If the script of a movie you choose to watch contains foul language, I wouldn't worry too much about it, as long as you are okay with it personally.

This concludes Part one of my three part post entitled "Everything Pure". In the next post I will cover the issue of graphic and/or pervasive violence, and in the final section I will take an over-all look at it from a strictly biblical viewpoint. Who knows? I might change my own mind. Only time and much thought will tell.

9 comments:

  1. Well-reasoned, interesting, and I agree 100%. Although, I'm very sad that you chose to give me a "a massage that was hurtful, cruel, and uncalled for." I generally find massages invigorating :P

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right, there are some words that are only wrong because of the spirit behind them, and not necessarily because of their meaning. However, most rated R movies don't just stop with these words but also include those that are wrong no matter what spirit is behind them: those that are sexually explicit, and, worse, taking the Lord's name in vain. Is it wrong to listen to someone else use them? Living in our world today it's inevitable that we will hear these words from time to time, but is it really alright to willinigly put yourself in a position where you know you will have offensive language thrown at you, purely for entertainment purposes? (And I'm talking to myself just as much as I am to you; I have seen my share of movies with bad language.) I don't really know the answer, only that Christians are to "abhor what is evil." (Romans 12:9)I think the biggest issue with watching movies with bad language is that we may bring ourselves to a point where we are used to the words and no longer offended by them. After all, if they are offensive to God, they really ought to be offensive to us. But I'm not yet 100% sure what I believe...this is a tough issue!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, true. I would go so far as to say the taking the Lord's name in vain is in a completely different catagory of sins. It doesn't seem the same to me. Other words, however, seem like nothing more than an extension of the American lingo. Slang, as it were. I don't know for sure, but I have yet more to say on the issue. Stay tuned.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Susie on the issue. We cannot avoid hearing offensive words every once and a while because we live in a fallen world. However, I believe the more we watch something happen the more likely we are to imitate it. We are a lot like children in that way. For example, if you live with parents who are bad drivers, you will likely become one because of the example they showed. In short, example is the same as teaching. That is why our parents always tell us to set a good example for those younger than us.
    My point in all of this is that the more we expose ourselves to something, the more likely we are to imitate it, it is the way we are created. So I do not think it is necessarily o.k. to watch movies with language because of that. And because of the influence we will have on others as a result of our word choice.
    Unfortunately, bad habits die hard and I am still struggling with this one. How difficult it is to do what is right.
    ~Elisabeth

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Freformedanswers.org%2Fanswer.asp%2Ffile%2F99772.qna%2Fcategory%2Fpt%2Fpage%2Fquestions%2Fsite%2F&h=b44f100f4c9dd70e3a122c7a7ef23366

    This link is to an article that said what I was trying to say :P I think he makes some great points, while keeping the idea in context. Read it and let me know what you think!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting article. I looked up Ephesians 4:29 in the Greek and the word for "unwholesome talk" is "sapros," which apparently means, "corrupted by one and no longer fit for use." To me it seems that the words this article defends would fit this definition. They might not be wrong in and of themselves, but are still unfit for use because of their corrupt association.(I actually have a really long argument against some points in the article that makes perfect sense in my head...and I tried to type it into words but it just didn’t come out how I want to say it. Suffice it to say, Christians should consider the association of the word before they use it in front of ANY class of people. Swearing might not sound “vulgar” to the Goth and Wiccan crowd, but don’t you think Christians should set higher standards for themselves than these people, and hold to them consistently? We are trying to represent a holy, blameless God.) Feel free to disagree!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I guess I would disagree with you on this point because I do not believe inanimate objects (or sounds, as it were) can be "guilty" by association. The sound obviously does not have a consciousness, and therefore cannot sin in and of itself. If it is not in and of itself sinful, than it must be the user of the word (who IS inherently sinful) that makes it vulgar.

    We have no examples of anything inanimate that is inherently sinful. If anything inanimate were sinful, rocks, for example, than these rocks, too would have to burn in hell. God's eyes, after all, cannot look on any sin. In this case the "vulgar" words would have to burn in hell. After all, the punishment for all sin is eternity in hell. This notion is obviously ridiculous.

    I guess, in a nutshell, I do not believe any word in and of itself can be inherently sinful. They have no soul, and can therefore do neither good nor evil, and can only be used as the speaker intended them, whether good or evil. The speaker imparts the meaning behind any word.

    Again, you defines the word "sapros" in the greek, and I would agree. I would, however, take this to mean anything of crass sexual implication. This IS unfit for use, because the meaning behind the word(s) is/are always the same.

    That's my take anyway :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. You're probably right...I don't know. I guess this could just be a matter or "all things are lawful for me but not all things are beneficial." But it's so hard to find the right balance between avoiding worldliness and avoiding legalism:( I'm glad you brought this up though...makes me think hard about something I otherwise wouldn't have.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wouldn't say I am probably right, cause I will approach it from completely different angle in the last post. The angle I will take at that point give all of entertainment in general a new light. At least for me anyway.

    Ah well. Good discussion anyway. It is Definately a good thing to think about these kinds of things! Good brain exercize if nothing else :P

    ReplyDelete